Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana

Volumen 75, núm. 2, A100523, 2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2023v75n2a100523

 

 

An automated monitoring system of urban pollution using geochemical and magnetic parameters

 

Un sistema automatizado de monitoreo de la contaminación urbana con el uso de parámetros geoquímicos y magnéticos

 

Francisco Bautista1,*, Dorian Bautista-Hernández1, Aristeo Pacheco 2, Avto Goguitchaichvili3, Juan Morales3,Ángeles Gallegos-Tavera1

 

1 Laboratorio Universitario de Geofísica Ambiental, Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Michoacán, Mexico.

2 Acts with Science. Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico.

3 Laboratorio Universitario de Geofísica Ambiental, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Michoacán, Mexico.

* Corresponding author: (F. Bautista) This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

How to cite this article:

Bautista, F., Bautista-Hernández, D., Pacheco, A., Goguitchaichvili, A., Morales, J., Gallegos-Tavera, A., 2023, An automated monitoring system of urban pollution using geochemical and magnetic parameters: Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 75 (2), A100523. http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2023v75n2a100523

 

Manuscript received: September 14, 2022; Corrected manuscript received: April 26, 2023; Manuscript accepted: May 8, 2023.

 

ABSTRACT

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that environmental pollution causes seven million premature deaths annually, equivalent to one in eight deaths worldwide. To combat this, the organized implementation of reliable indicators is critical, and these indicators should be monitored over short, medium, and long terms. The principal industrial and economic activities at Mexico’s national level are concentrated in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area. Urban expansion, with unmeasured and essentially unplanned growth, has been accompanied by a notable increase in environmental pollution. The software discussed herein quantifies and analyzes the contents of potentially toxic elements in soils, dust, and plants to monitor how environmental pollution contributes to the ill-health of the population of Mexico City and how these adverse effects could potentially be reduced. The software can analyze conventional geochemical data and alternative proxies such as magnetic parameters and color variations for three environmental matrices: soils, dust, and plants in urban areas.

Keywords: urban soils, urban dust, urban plants, magnetic properties, color, FRX.

 

RESUMEN

La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) estima que la contaminación ambiental causa siete millones de muertes prematuras al año, lo que equivale a una de cada ocho muertes en todo el mundo. Para combatir esto, la instrumentación organizada de indicadores confiables es crítica, y estos indicadores deben ser monitoreados a corto, mediano y largo plazo. Las principales actividades industriales y económicas a nivel nacional en México se concentran en la Zona Metropolitana de la Ciudad de México. La expansión urbana, con un crecimiento desmedido y esencialmente no planificado, ha ido acompañada de un notable aumento de la contaminación ambiental. El software discutido aquí cuantifica y analiza el contenido de elementos potencialmente tóxicos en suelos, polvos y plantas para monitorear cómo la contaminación ambiental contribuye a la mala salud de la población de la Ciudad de México y cómo estos efectos negativos podrían reducirse potencialmente. El software se puede utilizar para analizar datos geoquímicos convencionales junto con indicadores alternativos, como parámetros magnéticos y variaciones de color para tres matrices ambientales: suelos, polvos y plantas en áreas urbanas.

Palabras clave: suelos urbanos, polvo urbano, plantas urbanas, propiedades magnéticas, color, FRX.

 

  1. Introduction

The urbanization and industrialization of cities have produced increased emissions of heavy metals into the environment. In large urban populations such as Mexico City, London, Beijing, Madrid, and New York City, more than seven million deaths yearly due to cancer and other pollution-related diseases have been detected (WHO, 2014). In recent years there have been many findings worldwide of heavy metal pollution in soil (Aguilar et al, 2013a; Ihl et al, 2015), urban dust (Aguilar et al, 2013a, Cortés et al, 2017; Aguilera et al, 2019; Delgado et al, 2019; Morales et al., 2020) and urban plants (Aguilar et al, 2013a, 2013b). However, heavy metal pollution monitoring systems are not systematically implemented globally; only isolated disclosures have been made.

Pollution monitoring is complex and expensive due to the need to process large quantities of samples and information, and chemical analyses are a further cost. Efforts have therefore been made to find high-speed, inexpensive technologies called “proxies” that promote the study of heavy metal pollution, elements of which are magnetic properties (Cejudo et al, 2015; Sánchez-Duque et al, 2015) and the color of soils and dust (Cortés et al, 2015; Marín et al, 2018). These elements can be inexpensively acquired and are considered to provide reliable proxy indicators.

Many developing countries cannot count on many experts in heavy metal contamination, so the generation of technological tools that can analyze large quantities of information quickly and effectively is required. This work aimed to create software to save, sort, and analyze chemical information and relate it to proxy technologies with magnetic and color parameters in studying three environmental matrices: soils, dust, and tree leaves.

 

  1. Materials and Methods

2.1. SOFTWARE DESIGN

The design and development of the software were based on the Mexican Standard NMX-I-12207-NYCE-2011 (Secretariat of the Economy, 2011), using the “waterfall model” with its methodological focus on ordering the activities of software development from beginning to end, finalizing each activity before beginning a new one. The tools utilized in our study were: Java 1.8 as the programming language, the Integrated Development Environment Eclipse Photon 4.7 (IDE), and the relational database management system H2 1.4.195 Database Engine with the syntax of the consulted language structure (SQL). These tools were selected for their free access, flexibility, robustness, high performance, and to accommodate the large community of users who volunteered their support.

The Model-Vision-Controller (MVC) software construction architecture divides software development into three areas. The model is in charge of requesting the data from the database manager (DBMS) through defined mechanisms and delivering the data to persist over time. The view is in charge of interacting with the user and collecting the input and output data to be processed by the controller (Pop and Altar, 2014; Ishihara and Funabiki, 2017). The controller, that acts as a judge, is in charge of validating the data, requests, controls and deliberating whether or not they are sent to the model to be stored or to consult details. With this architecture, business rules can be separated from interfaces, language functions, and development environment, thus creating a more precise, more modular construction and structure that embraces change and is not closed by strong dependencies among interfaces, language, and business rules.

The algorithmic structures and interfaces were perfected to utilize a minimum quantity of information sources to meet the following minimum requirements: processor of 1.0 GHz or higher; 256 MB of RAM (Random-Access Memory) dedicated to optimizing performance; a VGA (Video Graphics Array) screen with a recommended resolution of 1024x768 and 32 MB of graphic memory with a dedicated hard disc of 100 MB or higher; JVM 1.8 (Java Virtual Machine) software installed in the equipment; operating system Windows 7 or higher; Linux with JVM 1.8 support; and Mac OS with JVM 1.8 support.

 

2.2. SAMPLE SITES AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATRICES

The processing of the information in the software is based on the relational database model that relates the sample sites with the country, city, and state, and to the environmental soil, dust, and urban plant matrices, with each of these sites being associated with data blocks of color, magnetics, and chemical properties. In this way, each sample site is associated with an environmental matrix, forming pairs of registers where one sample site is related to a matrix of soils, dust, and plants; thus, each environmental matrix is, in turn, associated with each data block of properties of color, magnetics, and chemical properties (Figure 1).

Figure 1. The architecture of the Heavy Metals Software.

The soil matrix contains information on the type of soil sample (superficial or control), sampling time (daily, weekly, biweekly, monthly, or annual), site, date, photograph, and observations. For soil sampling, a 2.5-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cylinder is used; the sample is dried for two weeks in the shade and then pulverized and sieved with a 2-mm mesh to carry out the analysis of the elements’ concentrations, for which X-ray fluorescence can be used (Bautista et al, 2011; Ihl et al, 2015).

The dust data matrix shows the type of swept surface (paving stone, cement, cobblestone, paving, soil, or dirt road), sample weight, temporality sampling, site, date, photograph, and observations. Dust sampling is done by delimiting one square meter on the surface to be swept; then, the sample is swept and stored in a plastic bag. The samples are labeled and weighed; They are dried in the shade for two weeks, ground, and sieved with 10, 30, or 60 mesh to analyze the concentrations of the elements (Aguilar et al, 2011; Aguilera et al, 2018).

The plant data matrix shows the common and scientific name of the plant, life form (tree, shrub, grass, palm), the height of leaves, type of leaves (young, mature or old), state of the plant (healthy, pruned, damaged, diseased), sedimentation period of the dust on the plant leaf (days, months or years), tree stump size (small, medium or large), damage to sidewalks, the timing of sampling, site, date, photography, and observations (Aguilar et al, 2013a). The plant data is recorded by measuring tree stump width and height, and height and diameter on all trees; the tree species that presented or not dust particles deposited on the leaf surfaces are recorded; a qualitative estimate of the state of health and maturity of the trees is made, and damage to the infrastructure is sought (Benavides et al, 2002; Flores and Álvarez-Sánchez, 2011).

 

2.3. CHEMICAL PROPERTIES AND INDICES OF CONTAMINATION

The chemical properties registered by the software are the major elements of oxide types such as MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, P2O5, K2O, CaO, TiO2, MnO, Fe2O3; major elements such as Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, P, Na, K, Mn, Ti; and heavy metals and other potentially toxic elements such as Rb, Si, Y, Ag, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se, V, Zn, Li, B, and Hg.

The indexes calculated from the concentrations of these elements are contamination factor, level of contamination, contaminate load, and geoaccumulation index (Cejudo-Ruíz et al; 2015), (Delgado, et al; 2015), (Ihl et al; 2015), (Sánchez-Duque et al; 2015).

The “Contamination Factor” index compares a background value with presumably contaminated samples. The background value can be an average value of world soils or a local value such as that of a subsurface horizon, the content of the element in the rock, or decile 1 of a population (Aguilera et al, 2021).

  (1)

Where CF is the contamination factor; Cm is the concentration of the potentially toxic element in the sample, and Cmr is the concentration of reference for the potentially toxic element.

Cdeg = CF1 + CF2 + CF3 + ... +CFn                                             (2)

 

Where Cdeg is the level of contamination and CF represents the contamination factor of each element potentially analyzed.

  (3)

Where ICC is the index of contaminate load; n represents the number of potentially toxic elements, and CF is the contamination factor.

  (4)

Where Igeo is the geoaccumulation index; Cn is the concentration of the chemical element in the soil; Bn is the geochemical base of reference of the elements, and 1.5 is the constant that represents the fluctuations of the substance in the environment and the anthropogenic influence.

The “geoaccumulation index” index compares an element’s background value with the presumably contaminated samples. Still, it uses base 2 logarithms and a constant of 1.5 to account for variations in the background level (Aguilera et al, 2021).

Cdeg = CF1 + CF2 + CF3 + ... +CFn

 

2.4. MAGNETIC PROPERTIES AS A PROXY

The values of magnetic susceptibility at frequencies of 976 Hz, 3904 Hz, 15616 Hz (available with the Kappabridge MFK1-FA equipment), and at 465 Hz and 4650 Hz (Bartington MS2B operating frequencies) are designated as Kf1, Kf2, Kf3, Klf, Khf, respectively; NRM (Mass Normalized Natural Remanent Magnetization) in mAm2 kg-1; ARM (Anhysteretic Remanent Magnetization) obtained in an alternate field (AC) of 120 mT with a field of direct current (CD) of 100 μT, in units of Am-1; IRM (Isothermal Remanent Magnetization) obtained at ambient temperature and with magnetic field pulses of 1000 mT, 100 mT, 200 mT, 300 mT in units of A/m designated as IRM1000, IRM100, IRM200, IRM300 respectively; specific magnetic susceptibility at frequencies of 976 Hz, 3904 Hz, 15616 Hz, 465 Hz, 4650 Hz in μm3 kg-1 designated as χf1, χf2, χf3, χlf, χhf respectively; percentage of frequency-dependent susceptibility at frequencies Xdf1,2%, Xdf1,3%, Xdf2,3%, Xdlf,hf%; anhysteretic magnetic susceptibility Χarm; and S-100, S-200, S-300 ratios determined by the isothermal remanent magnetization obtained at ambient temperature and with inverse magnetic field of 100, 200, 300 mT respectively, divided by the residual isothermal magnetization obtained at 1000 mT; unitless parameters.

Curves of magnetic susceptibility versus temperature permit to identify the points of inflection in the curves during the process of heating, where the value of the function is equal to zero (Nanlohy et al, 2022).

  (5)

Where θ is the temperature, and k is the volumetric magnetic susceptibility and the opening data.

  (6)

Where θ is the temperature, and f’(k) is the value of the first derivative calculated in Equation 5.

 

  1. Results

3.1. CAPTURE AND PROCESSING OF ENVIRONMENTAL MATRICES DATA

In the site’s graphic interface, it is seen the number of samples and information about geolocalization (countries, cities, and towns), along with soil usage, types of road pavement (or lack of it), and geology (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Screen with the main menu with the data of the study site and geographic location.

The environmental matrices module corresponds to the soil, dust, and plant samples. Each matrix shows different data; for example, in the case of urban dust, the quantity of dust per surface unit is registered, as are the types of surfaces on or near where the samples were collected, for example, those collected near cement sidewalks, paved streets, streets surfaced with cement, unpaved roads or those with paving stones or tiles (Bautista et al, 2011). It is essential to capture the quantity of dust from different surface areas because the contaminated load can be calculated, along with the amount of an element per square meter (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Matrix menu (soil, dust, plant) and information regarding the selected matrix.

In the case of soils, the bulk density is registered, along with the coarse fragments and the soil usage in the area (gardening, parks, wooded areas, etc.). The bulk density and the percentage of coarse fragments are used to calculate the quantity of heavy metals per surface unit, which is relevant data in calculating the type of amendments per surface unit (Bautista et al, 2016; Bautista et al, 2017).

The environmental matrices (soils, dust, and plants) and the properties in the data blocks (oxides and heavy metals) are registered by season, allowing for monthly, seasonal, or yearly studies. The benefits of structuring the data in a relational model are a) to avoid data duplication, b) to improve referential integrity, and c) to improve data compression.

 

3.2. DATA BLOCKS AND GRAPHICS

The module referred to as “Data Blocks” works with the groups of data of the chemical and magnetic properties measured, such as the oxides MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, P2O5, K2O, CaO, TiO2, MnO, Fe2O3; the major elements such as Al, Ca, Fe, Mg, P, Na, K, Mn, Ti; the heavy metals, such as Rb, Si, Y; Ag, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se, V, Zn, Li, B, Hg; and the magnetic properties (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Block menu about physical and chemical properties (color, magnetic properties, potentially toxic elements) of soils, urban dust, and plants.

In this module, the index of contamination is automatically calculated, as is the index of the contaminate load, the contamination factor, the index of geoaccumulation, and the level of contamination. The option of converting the concentration units to quantity or contaminate load was included. In the case of magnetic properties, the conversion was done from the primary parameters to the calculated properties.

The “Graphics” module is divided into two submodules, “Geochemical” and “Magnetic properties”. The geochemical submodule analyses of variance can be done with the Kruskal-Wallis’s technique, given that the data for heavy metals does not produce a Gaussian Curve (Figure 5). This type of graphics permits the identification of a median, minimum, or maximum value, inferior or superior limit, first or third quartile, the interquartile range, atypical values, notches (that represent a level of reliability of an average of 95% when this is not overlaid), and values too remote from the average in the same graphic for each element.

Figure 5. Example of one analysis of variance of lead by soil use.

The graphics generated in the “Magnetic Properties” module are magnetic susceptibility, normalized magnetic susceptibility, volumetric magnetic susceptibility, terrain curves versus residual isothermal magnetization, temperature curves versus volumetric magnetic susceptibility, and S ratios (Table 1).

Table 1. Magnetic parameters applied in environmental samples and their possible interpretations.
(Maher et al., 1986; Thompson and Oldfield, 1986; Bautista et al., 2014).

Other functions of the “Heavy Metals” software are: 1) generate graphics of threshold lines, linear regression, and straight-line equation; b) estimation of the values r and r2; c) identification of anomalous values; d) filtration of data by country, state, and city; e) tabular and graphic exportation; and f) function for estimating the values directly in the graphics.

For estimating magnetic coercivity and grain size in the “Heavy metals” software, it is necessary to trace the curve of magnetic susceptibility, dependent on the frequency versus the specific magnetic susceptibility of the frequency, by pairing the groups of parameters Xdf1, 2% versus Xf1; Xdf1, 3% versus Xf1; Xdf2, 3% versus Xf2; Xdflf, hf versus Xlf, and it is also possible to trace the magnetic susceptibility dependent on the frequency versus the volumetric magnetic susceptibility by pairing the groups of parameters Xdf1, 2% versus Kf1; Xdf1, 3% versus Kf1; Xdf2, 3% versus Kf2; Xdflf, hf% versus Klf. “The purpose of this graphic is to permit the detection of the presence of ferrimagnetic in ultra-fine grains of sizes (superparamagnetic) smaller than 0.02 µm” (Sánchez-Duque et al, 2015).

On the other hand, graphing in the “Heavy metals” software the isothermal remanent magnetization versus susceptibility at different frequencies allows to produce of a curve by pairing the groups of parameters Xf1 versus IRM1000; Xf2 versus IRM1000; Xf3 versus IRM1000; Xf3 versus IRM1000; Xlf versus IRM1000; Xhf versus IRM1000 (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Example of graphic of magnetic susceptibility and isothermal remanent magnetization.

Also, estimating the concentration of ferrimagnetic materials allows producing a curve of volumetric magnetic susceptibility versus isothermal remanent magnetization by pairing the groups of parameters Kf1 versus MRI1000; Kf2 versus MRI1000; Kf3 versus IRM1000; Klf versus IRM1000; Khf versus IRM1000. The curves of applied magnetic field versus isothermal remanent magnetization yield the curve of the applied magnetic field with groups of the series of data and correlate the magnetization value with the applied magnetic field for a set of defined groups (Figure 7). Temperature curves versus volumetric magnetic susceptibility yield the curve of gradual increase in temperature versus susceptibility, beginning with the ambient temperature and reaching up to 700 °C at a rate of 10 °C min-1, followed by cooling at the same rate. “The purpose of this graphic is to estimate the thermomagnetic stability and the type of the dominant magnetic mineral through the determination of Curie Temperature (Tc)” (Sánchez-Duque et al, 2015), as well as making it possible to identify the points of inflection in the curves with the calculation of the first and second derivatives defined in the Equations 5 and 6.

Figure 7. Example of isotermal remanent magnetization (IRM) versus applied magnetic field curves.

3.3. THE GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION OF THE STUDY SITES

The “Map” module offers the visualization of the geographic localization of each sample site using Google Maps® and Google Earth®. The spatial ubication of sites can be exported as a *.kml file which can be processed in the geographic information system to undertake a spatial analysis (Figure 8). The graphical interface of the “Map” module permits to review of the environment of each sample site, giving information about the type of road pavement (or its lack), the proximity of governmental infrastructures (schools, government service offices, parks, etc.), and also the type of factories, businesses, etc.

Figure 8. The geographical location of the selected study sites.

S ratios of the heavy metals software allow constructing a curve of values grouped in the lines of roadways and areas that have been additionally engineered, such as natural green areas, agriculture areas, residential areas, areas of mixed-use, industrial sites, protected areas, and commercial areas, to differentiate antiferromagnetic minerals from ferrimagnetic minerals with the S-100, S-200, and S-300 ratios.

The “Heavy Metals” software and some (example) input files are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

 

  1. Discussion and conclusions

The “Heavy Metals” software is unique in its category. There are software programs that are used to evaluate the agricultural capacity of soils (De la Rosa et al, 2004; Dubrovina and Bautista, 2014), and there are models of evaluation for environmental functions (Lehmann et al, 2008; Lehmann and Stahr, 2010; Bautista et al, 2017), and software has even been developed to evaluate the models (De la Rosa et al, 2004; Gallegos et al, 2014, 2016; Bautista et al, 2016; Bedolla et al, 2018). However, the software presented here to evaluate heavy metals in urban zones is the only one. There are no antecedents of evaluation models of the relation of heavy metals and urban dust and plants, much less any software to run them.

The “Heavy Metals” software could be improved in the areas of the index for screening heavy metals in soils (Bautista et al, 2017) and with the inclusion of evaluations throughout the soil profiles, which would necessitate the measurement of the coarse fragments and the bulk density (Bautista et al, 2016).

As to the architecture of the “Heavy Metals” software, it is worth mentioning that: it functions on any platform, be it Windows, Apple, Unix, or others; it is bilingual (Spanish and English), and it is user-friendly. The inclusion of magnetism as a proxy technique has made it very functional. Therefore, it would be helpful for those in charge of the environmental politics of a country with few such resources to aid in creating relevant and appropriate decisions and expenditures to correct environmental pollution issues. No computer program of this type exists in the software market worldwide, whether scientific or commercial.

 

Contributions of authors

Conceptualization: FB, AP, AG, (2) analysis or data acquisition: FB, AG, JM, (3) methodological/technical development: FB, AP, AGT, (4) writing of the original manuscript: FB, AP, DB, (5) writing of the corrected and edited manuscript: FB, AG, DB, (6) graphic design: AP, AGT, (7) fieldwork: FB, AP, JM, (8) interpretation: FB, AG, JM, AGT, (9) financing: FB, AG.

 

Financing

This study was financially supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, project CB-2016-283135; Secretaría de Ciencia Tecnología e Innovación de la CDMX; and DGAPA-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (PAPIIT Project IN208621).

 

Acknowledgements

For their technical support we thank Anahí Aguilera, Carmen Delgado, Rubén Cejudo, and Rafael García, as well as the company Skiu. Francisco Bautista thanks the DGAPA, UNAM, for the financial support for the sabbatical stay at the Colegio de Postgraduados, Cardenás, Tabasco.

 

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

References

Aguilar, B., Mejía, V., Goguichaishvili, A., Escobar, J., Bayona, G., Bautista, F., Morales Contreras, J., Ihl, T., 2013a, Reconnaissance environmental magnetic study of urban soils, dust and leaves from Bogotá, Colombia: Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 57, 741-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-012-0682-9

Aguilar, B., Bautista, F., Gogichaishvili, A., Quintana, P., Carvallo, C., Battu, J., 2013b, Rock-Magnetic properties of topsoils and urban dust from Morelia (>800,000 inhabitants), Mexico: implications for anthropogenic pollution monitoring in Mexico’s medium size cities: Geofísica Internacional, 52 (2), 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7169(13)71467-3

Aguilera, A., Armendariz, C., Quintana, P., García-Oliva, F., Bautista, F., 2019, Influence of land use and road type on the elemental composition of urban dust in a Mexican Metropolitan Area: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 28(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/90358

Bautista, F., Campuzano, E., Delgado, C., Goguichaichvili, A., 2017, El índice de sorción de metales pesados en suelos urbanos: el caso de Morelia Michoacán: Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Geología, 69(2), 433- 445. https://doi.org/10.18268/bsgm2017v69n2a8

Bautista, F., Cejudo, R., Aguilar, B., Gogichaishvili, A., 2014, El potencial del magnetismo en la clasificación de suelos: una revisión: Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana, 66(2),123-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2014v66n2a11

Bautista, F., Gallegos, A., Pacheco, A., 2016, Analysis of the environmental functions of soil profile data: soil & environment: México, Skiu, 72 p.

Bautista F., Palacio, j.l., Delfín, H., (Eds.), 2011,Técnicas de muestreo para el estudio del manejo de recursos naturales y el cuidado del ambiente: México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro de Investigaciones en Geografía Ambiental, 790 p.

Bedolla-Ochoa, C., Bautista, F., Gallegos, A., 2018, Environmental functions of smallholder farmer land classes in the Zicuirán-Infiernillo Biosphere Reserve, Mexico: Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 24(3), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2017.09.058

Cejudo-Ruíz, R., Bautista, F., Quintana, P., Delgado-Carranza, M.C., Aguilar, D., Goguichaishvili, A., Morales-Contreras, J.J., 2015, Correlación entre elementos potencialmente tóxicos y propiedades magnéticas en suelos de la Ciudad de México para la identificación de sitios contaminados: definición de umbrales magnéticos: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 32 (1), 50-61.

Cortés, J.L., Bautista, F., Delgado, C., Quintana, P., Aguilar, D., García, A., Figueroa, C., Gogichaishvili, A., 2017, Spatial distribution of heavy metals in urban dust from Ensenada, Baja California, México: Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 23 (1), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2016.02.005

Cortés, J.L., Bautista, F., Quintana, P., Aguilar, D., Goguichaishvili, A., 2015, The color of urban dust as indicator of contamination by the potentially toxic elements: the case of Ensenada, Baja California México: Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 21(3), 255-266. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2015.02.003

De la Rosa, D., Mayol, F., Díaz-Pereira, E., Fernández, M., De la Rosa, D., 2004, A land evaluation decision support system (MicroLEIS DSS) for agricultural soil protection: With special reference to the Mediterranean region: Environmental Modeling & Software, 19(10), 929–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.10.006

Delgado, C., Bautista, F., Goguitchaichvili, A., Cortés, J.L., Quintana, P., Aguilar, D., Cejudo R., 2019, Identificación de las zonas contaminadas con metales pesados en el polvo urbano en la CDMX: Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental, 35 (1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.2019.35.01.06

Dubrovina, I., Bautista, F., 2014, Analysis of the suitability of various soil groups and types of climate for avocado growing in the state of Michoacán, Mexico: Eurasian Soil Science, Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Fertility, 47(5), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229314010037

Gallegos, A., Bautista, F., Dubrovina, I., 2016, Suelo y ambiente: Software para evaluar las funciones ambientales de los suelos: Software & Systems, 114(2), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.15827/0236-235x.114.195-200

Gallegos-Tavera, M.A., Bautista, F., Álvarez, O., 2014, Software para la evaluación de las funciones de los suelos (Assofu): Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 20 (2), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2012.11.060

Ihl, T., Bautista, F., Cejudo, R., Delgado, C., Quintana, P., Aguilar, D., Gogichaishvili, A., 2015, Concentration of toxic elements in topsoils of the metropolitan area of Mexico City: a spatial analysis using Ordinary kriging and Indicator kriging: Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental, 31 (1), 47-62.

Ishihara, N., Funabiki, N., Kuribayashi, M., Kao, W.C., 2017, A software architecture for Java Programming learning assistant system: International Journal of Computer & Software Engineering, 2, 116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15344/2456-4451/2017/116

Lehmann, A., Stahr, K., 2010, The potential of soil functions and planner-oriented soil evaluation to achieve sustainable land use: Journal of Soils and Sediments, 10(6), 1092–1102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-010-0207-5

Lehmann, A., David, S., Stahr, K., 2008, TUSEC-Technique for soil evaluation and categorization for natural and anthropogenic soils: Germany, Universitat Hohenheim Bodenkundliche Hefte, 113p.

Marín, P., Sánchez-Navarro, A., Díaz- Pereira, E., Bautista, F., Romero-Muñoz, M., Delgado-Iniesta, M. J., 2018, Assessment of heavy metals and color as indicators of contamination of traffic intensity and sampling location: Sustainability, 10, 4105. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114105

Maher, B.A., 1986, Characterisation of soils by mineral magnetic measurements: Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 42, 76-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(86)80010-3

Morales, J., Aguilera, A., Bautista, F., Cejudo, R., Gogichaishvili, A., Hernández-Bernal, M.S., 2020, Heavy metal content estimation in the Mexico City Street dust: An inter-method comparison and Pb levels assessment during the last decade: SN Applied Sciences, 2,1841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03647-5

Nanlohy, G.B., Yosia1, G.G., Salim, Ch., Mariyanto, M., 2022, Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2309 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012035

Pop, D.P., Altar, A., 2014, Designing an MVC model for rapid web application development: Procedia Engineering, 69, 1172–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.106

Sánchez-Duque, A., Bautista, F., Goguitchaichvili, A., Cejudo-Ruiz, R., Reyes-López, J.A., Solís-Domínguez, F.A., Morales-Contreras, J.J., 2015, Evaluación de la contaminación ambiental a partir del aumento magnético en polvos urbanos. Caso de estudio en la ciudad de Mexicali, México: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 32(3), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.22201/cgeo.20072902e.2015.3.598

Secretaría de Economía, 2005, NMX-I-045-NYCE-2005 Tecnología de la información-software-procesos del ciclo de vida del software: México, D.F., Diario Oficial de la Federación, 29 de noviembre de 2005. https://nyce.org.mx/catalogodeestandaresnyce/producto/nmx-i-12207-nyce-2011-tecnologia-de-la-informacion-software-procesos-del-ciclo-de-vida-del-software-cancela-a-la-nmx-i-045-nyce-2005/

Thompson, R., Oldfield, F., 1986, Environmental Magnetism: Londres, Allen and Unwin, 227 p.

World Health Organization (WHO), 2014, 7 million premature deaths annually linked to air pollution (online): Switzerland, WHO. https://www.who.int/news/item/25-03-2014-7-million-premature-deaths-annually-linked-to-air-pollution

 

Annex 1. Basic operating instructions.

Site loading. Site data is loaded from the toolbar by clicking the register a site button in the pop-up window. The data to be registered is classified into site data and geographic location; starting with the site data, we must enter the site number, name, road, land use, climate (weather), geology, time, and date, followed by the geographic location section in which we must indicate the type of coordinates used to locate the sample, we must also to enter the country, state, city, and delegation to which the sample is associated.

Data capture in environmental matrices.

The capture of the environmental matrices is done from the new data function of the toolbar. To carry out the procedure, select the environmental matrix in which we want to start the data capture in the view section and click on the new data button. The pop-up window will automatically be displayed to capture a new data sample.

For example, to capture urban dust data, you must enter the key, surface area, sweep area, type of sweep, weight, observations, temporality (frequency with which sampling is performed), and site to which the sample is associated. , date, photograph, and finally, the save button of the window control options is pressed.

The data editing procedure begins with the selection of the matrix, where we must select the desired view; in the data table, we set the record to be modified, followed by clicking on the “Edit data” button, and a pop-up window will automatically be displayed with the registry data allowing each of the values to be modified. Finally, we press the save button of the window control options. The changes will automatically be reflected in the data table. To delete the record of any matrix, press the “Delete data” button; as a general rule, we will be asked to confirm the deletion of the form.

The registration of potentially toxic elements (PTE) is done from the new data button on the toolbar in the “Register potentially toxic elements” interface, which asks us to enter the registration identification key, the concentrations of Ag, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mo, Ni, Pb, Se, Ti, V, Zn, Li, B, Hg with the associated variables of temporality, site number, name of the site to which you want to associate the concentrations of PTE, date and time. The procedure consists of ordering the source data in the tabular format of the capture interface and selecting to copy and paste the data in the interface with the help of the paste button on the toolbar. The source data will automatically be tabulated in our table capture. Finally, we press the save button from the toolbar, and the data will be stored in the software database.

In the blocks interface, from the view of potentially toxic elements (PTE), we can convert units mg/kg to mg/m2 for each of the records stored in the database. The procedure we must follow is to select any record from the PTE data table and press the conversions button on the toolbar.

The calculation of the indices. The procedure begins with the selection of the records that we want to consider to calculate the index. The selection can be made directly in the conversion table using the combination of the CTRL + A keys (select all the records) or CTRL + primary mouse click. (specific selection of records), on the selection, we press the secondary mouse button, and the displayed options select the index to calculate; it is necessary to remember that to obtain the pollutant load index and geo-accumulation index, it is essential first to calculate the factor of pollution.


Peer Reviewing under the responsibility of Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA license(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)