Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana

Volumen 65, núm. 2, 2013, p. 255-264

http://dx.doi.org/10.18268/BSGM2013v65n2a7

Ghost shrimps (Decapoda: Axiidea: Callianassidae) of the Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) Ocozocoautla Formation, Chiapas (Mexico)

Matúš Hyžný1,*, Francisco J. Vega2, Marco A. Coutiño3

1 Department of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina G1, SVK-842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia.
2 Instituto de Geología,UNAM, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, México DF 04510, Mexico.
3 Museo de Paleontología “Eliseo Palacios Aguilera”, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente e Historia Natural/Dirección de Paleontología, Calzada de los Hombres Ilustres s/n, Colonia Antiguo Parque Madero, Tuxtla Gutiérrez 29000, Chiapas, Mexico.

* This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Abstract

 On the basis of newly collected material, two ghost shrimp taxa from the lower Maastrichtian Ocozocoautla Formation in Chiapas (Mexico) are recorded. Callianassa burckhardti is reassigned to Eucalliax, which extends the known fossil record of this genus to the early Maastrichtian. A new species, Callianassa (s.l.) ocozocoautlaensis, is described based on a single specimen whose state of preservation does not enable a firm generic assignment, despite the fact that the material exhibits striking similarities to extant Callianassa modesta, occasionally treated as a member of the genus Cheramus. The fossil record of ghost shrimps from Mexico is briefly reappraised and their survival across the K/Pg boundary is discussed. The conservative body plan of ctenochelid and callianassid taxa is emphasized and it is postulated that virtually all major ghost shrimp clades were already established well before the Cenozoic.

Keywords: Callianassidae, Eucalliax, Callianassa, Ocozocoautla Formation, Maastrichtian, Mexico.

 

Resumen

 Con base en material recientemente colectado, se reportan dos taxa de camarones fantasma de la Formación Ocozocoautla del Maastrichtiano inferior de Chiapas (México). Callianassa burckhardti es reasignada a Eucalliax, por lo que el registro fósil del género respectivo se extiende al Maastrichtiano temprano. Una especie nueva, Callianassa (s.l.) ocozocoautlaensis, se describe con base en un solo especimen, cuya preservación no permite la identificación confiable a nivel de género, aunque el material exhibe fuertes afinidades con la especie existente Callianassa modesta, que en ocasiones es tratada como un miembro de Cheramus. El registro fósil de camarones fantasma de México es brevemente reevaluado, y se discute su supervivencia a través del límite K/P. Se enfatiza el plan conservativo de los taxa de ctenoquélidos y calianásidos, y se postula que virtualmente todos los clados mayores de camarones fantasma se establecieron antes del Cenozoico.

Palabras Clave: Callianassidae, Eucalliax, Callianassa, Formación Ocozocoautla, Maastrichtiano, México.

 

1. Introduction

Mexican fossil ghost shrimps have previously been recorded by Vega et al. (1995a, b, 2001a, b, 2007, 2008, 2009) and Schweitzer et al. (2006a, b). These occurrences are briefly summarized in Table 1. The present contribution adds new data on Mexican fossil ghost shrimps by recording Callianassa burckhardti Böhm, 1911 for the first time in Mexico, and by transferring it to Eucalliax Manning and Felder, 1991. In addition, a new form, Callianassa (s.l.) ocozocoautlaensisn. sp., is described from the same strata. The generic placement of the single specimen available to date is obscure, although both chelipeds are preserved, which is usually enough for generic identification (compare Hyžný, 2012; Hyžný and Hudáčková, 2012).

Table 1. Synopsis of Mexican callianassid and ctenochelid ghost shrimp occurrences; for details, see the text.

 

2. Localities and geological setting

The specimens recorded herein stem from two localities exposing the Ocozocoautla Formation, northeast of Tuxtla Gutiérrez, near the Tuxtla-Veracruz motorway (Figure 1). The ‘Megaxantho locality‘ is situated on the east side of that motorway, 25.2 km NW of Tuxtla Gutiérrez, with coordinates 16°48´13.57´´N, 93°20´58.35´´W. The holotype, and sole specimen known, of Callianassa (s.l.) ocozocoautlaensis n. sp. was collected here. Specimens of Eucalliax burckhardti(Böhm, 1911) n. comb. originate from the ‘Reptiles locality‘, on the west side of the motorway, 39.86 km NW of Tuxtla Gutiérrez, with coordinates 16°54´36.02´´N, 93°26´56.26´´W.

The type section of the Ocozocoautla Formation is situated northwest of the town of the same name. It is 630 m thick, comprising red and brown prodeltaic sandstones, and some conglomerate at the base. Towards the top, the lithology changes to shale, marl and limestone of a beige colour (Gutiérrez-Gil, 1956; Chubb, 1959; Frost and Langenheim, 1974). Channels are exposed at some localities. Lateral lithologic changes within the formation indicate changes in depth of the basin, from shallow, restricted, lagoonal conditions in the East to deeper, outer platform settings in the Northwest. The Ocozocoautla Formation is underlain by the Sierra Madre Limestone, which is Early to middle Cretaceous in age (Steele and Waite, 1986), and is comformably overlain by the Paleocene Soyaló Formation (Frost and Langenheim, 1974; López-Ramos, 1981; Quezada-Muñetón, 1987). The latter unit is missing in the area studied. Based upon the presence of calcareous algae, benthic foraminifera and rudists (Gutiérrez-Gil, 1956; Chubb, 1959; Robinson, 1968; Michaud, 1988), a lagoonal environment has been suggested for the upper part of the Ocozocoautla Formation. The early Maastrichtian age for most of the formation is based on foraminiferan biostratigraphy (Omaña-Pulido, 1998, 2006; Alencáster and Omaña-Pulido, 2006). Reference is made to Vega et al. (2001a) for more details on biostratigraphy.

The material studied is deposited in the Museo de Paleontología "Eliseo Palacios Aguilera", Secretaría de Medio Ambiente e Historia Natural/Dirección de Paleontología, Calzada de los Hombres Ilustres s/n, Colonia Antiguo Parque Madero, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, 29000, Chiapas, México (abbreviation: IHNFG).


Figure 1. Map showing the two localities of the Ocozocoautla Formation from which the specimens studied were collected, near Tuxtla Gutiérrez (Chiapas, Mexico).

 

3. Systematic palaeontology

 

Order Decapoda Latreille, 1802

Infraorder Axiidea de Saint Laurent, 1979

Family Callianassidae Dana, 1852

Subfamily Eucalliacinae Manning and Felder, 1991

Discussion. The fossil record of the subfamily and the assignment of the extinct material to its respective genera have recently been discussed by Hyžný (2012) and Hyžný and Hudáčková (2012). As pointed out by the former, numerous fossil taxa originally described under the collective name of Callianassa may actually represent members of the subfamily Eucalliacinae. As documented here (i.e., transfer of Callianassa burckhardti to Eucalliax), the genus, and hence the subfamily, was already established during the Late Cretaceous.

 

Genus EucalliaxManning and Felder, 1991

Type species. Callianassa quadracutaBiffar, 1970

Discussion. The complex taxonomy of the genus has lately been reviewed by Hyžný and Hudáčková (2012) and need not be repeated here. Fossil taxa assigned to Eucalliax were listed by Schweitzer et al. (2010) and briefly reviewed by Hyžný and Hudáčková (2012). In distinguishing eucalliacine genera, we follow Ngoc-Ho (2003) and Hyžný (2012) rather than Sakai (2011). Hyžný (2012) argued that a square major cheliped manus with distally converging margins, the presence of a ridge on the lateral surface at the base of the fixed finger and a relatively short fixed finger, often with a triangular tooth, are of taxonomic importance for the assignment of material to the subfamily Eucalliacinae.

Callianassa burckhardti virtually possesses all of the above-mentioned characters. It also clearly shows a propodus/carpus articulation which varies between 90° and 130° (contrary to descriptions by Aguirre-Urreta, 1989 and Feldmann et al., 1995), which is not uncommon within the Eucalliacinae. This character was once considered of taxonomic importance for identification of Protocallianassa Beurlen, 1930; on this basis alone, numerous callianassid taxa have been assigned to this genus. Hyžný (2012) argued that an oblique carpus/propodus articulation also occurs in members of the subfamily Eucalliacinae and that this character in itself could not be considered to be of taxonomic importance on the generic level. Recently, Schweitzer and Feldmann (2012) re-examined the type material of Callianassa archiaci A. Milne-Edwards, 1860, the type species of Protocallianassa, and documented that the carpus/propodus articulation was in fact straight in that species.

 

Eucalliax burckhardti (Böhm, 1911) new combination

Figures 2.1–2.8

1911 Callianassa burckhardtiBöhm, p. 39, text-fig; Glaessner, 1929, p. 77; Aguirre-Urreta, 1989, p. 540, pl. 60, figs. 12–17; Feldmann, Casadío, Chirino-Galvez and Aguirre-Urreta, 1995, p. 4, figs. 4.2–4.3; Schweitzer, Feldmann, Garassino, Karasawa and Schweigert, 2010, p. 34; Hyžný, 2012, p. 55.

Protocallianassa (Callianassa) burckhardtiBöhm: Taylor, 1979, p. 22.

?Protocallianassasp.; Feldmann, Casadío, Chirino-Galvez and Aguirre-Urreta, 1995, p. 6, fig. 4.4.

Diagnosis.Callianassid with chelipeds of subequal size and dissimilar in shape.

Major propodus usually square, minor propodus subrectangular, external surface densely beset with tubercles, fixed finger with oblique ridge extending onto the manus, the ridge more pronounced in the minor chela.

Description.Major cheliped carpus/propodus articulation at angle 90–100°, carpus/propodus articulation in minor chela at 100–130°. Major propodus usually square with slightly converging upper and lower margins, minor propodus usually subrectangular with subparallel upper and lower margins; external surface rounded, ornamented with tubercles, occasionally evenly distributed over the entire surface; internal surface smoother; fixed finger with an oblique ridge extending onto the manus; the ridge more pronounced on the minor chela.

Material examined. One major right propodus (IHNFG-4660), one major left propodus (IHNFG-4661) and two minor right propodi (IHNFG-4662, IHNFG-4663); all the material is fragmentary, i.e., lacking the fixed finger.

Measurements (in mm).right minor propodus (IHNFG-4662), length 13.3, height 11.4; left major propodus (IHNFG-4661), length 14.5, height 11.1; right minor propodus (IHNFG-4663), length 13.8, height 9.5; right major propodus (IHNFG-4660); length 12.8, height 12.5.

Occurrence. To date, this species is known from the Maastrichtian and Danian (lower Paleocene) of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina (Böhm, 1911; Aguirre-Urreta, 1989; Feldmann et al., 1995). The present record extends its geographic range into Mexico. Eucalliax burckhardtiis considered the oldest current record of the genus.

Discussion. Eucalliax burckhardti has massive chelipeds (compare Böhm, 1911; Aguirre-Urreta, 1989), in contrast to Calliaxina Ngoc-Ho, 2003 (non sensu Sakai, 2011) which has laterally compressed ones. The major cheliped of Calliax de Saint Laurent, 1973 is distinctly different from that of Eucalliax (Hyžný, 2012) and from the material presented herein. Aguirre-Urreta (1989) described the carpus of C. burckhardti as subrectangular and with parallel margins; this matches the morphological variability of carpus in species of Eucalliax (compare Hyžný and Hudáčková, 2012). The reassignment of C. burckhardti to Eucalliaxwas already hinted at by Hyžný (2012).

Aguirre-Urreta (1989) noted that large propodi were usually square, whereas smaller specimens were slightly subrectangular. She argued that this was a consequence of allometric growth; this is not unlikely, but it is more plausible that smaller specimens represent minor chela. Thus, we interpret the square morphotype as the major chela (Figs. 2.3, 2.6–2.8), whereas the subrectangular morphotype is seen as the minor chela (Figs. 2.1–2.2, 2.4–2.5) of the same taxon.

From the Danian of Argentina, Feldmann et al. (1995) recorded two propodi which were attributed to Protocallianassa sp.; these originated from the same locality as Callianassa burchardti. These specimens are similar to the minor chelae of some extant species of Eucalliax, and thus might belong to Callianassa burckhardti. However, they are quite large and their shape does not really fit the supposed minor chelae of C. burckhardti. Thus, their affinities remain questionable.

The oblique carpus/propodus articulation is visible in the holotype of C. burckhardti; illustrated both by Böhm (1911) and Aguirre-Urreta (1989), although the latter author described it as “straight” (i.e., at right angle). In the supposed minor chela (subrectangular morphotype), the angle is larger.

Eucalliax burckhardti is easily distinguished from congeners as there is no other extant or fossil species of Eucalliax known with a similar tuberculation; in this respect, E. burckhardtiis unique.

Interestingly, Ramos (1981) and Aguirre-Urreta (1989) recorded C. burckhardti to be associated with Thalassinoides-type ichnofossils. Although no specimen was recovered from inside such burrows, the abundance of chelipeds and their close proximity to fossil burrows leave little room for doubt - C. burckhardti was the tracemaker. The association of burrows together with ghost shrimp body fossils is rather rare in the fossil record (e.g. Bishop and Williams, 2005; Hyžný, 2011), and thus deserves attention.


Figure 2. Eucalliax burckhardti (Böhm, 1911) new comb., Lower Maastrichtian Ocozocoautla Formation. 1–2: right minor propodus (IHNFG-4662), outer (1) and inner (2) surface; 3, 6: left major propodus (IHNFG-4661), outer (3) and inner (6) surface; 4–5: right minor propodus (IHNFG-4663), outer (4) and inner (5) surface; 7–8: right major propodus (IHNFG-4660), outer (7) and inner (8) surface. All specimens are to scale and coated with ammonium chloride prior to photography.

 

Subfamily Callianassinae Dana, 1852

Discussion. The subfamily currently comprises 13 genera (but see Sakai, 2011) and numerous species, most of them assigned to Callianassa. The group apparently encompasses several clades (Felder and Robles, 2009), the interrelationships of which are currently under study (P.C. Dworschak, personal communication, 2011).

The material studied exhibits close similarities to Callianassa modesta De Man, 1905 (see below), which has been treated as a member of Cheramus Bate, 1888 (e.g., Biffar, 1973; Sakai, 2011) or Callianassa (Poore, 2012). De Grave et al. (2009) assigned Cheramusto its own subfamily, but the phylogenetic analysis of Felder and Robles (2009) resolved the genus inside the subfamily Callianassinae. In this respect, we follow Felder and Robles (2009) and Sakai (2011) in abandoning the Cheraminae as a distinct subfamily.

 

Genus CallianassaLeach, 1814

Type species. Cancer (Astacus) subterraneusMontagu, 1808

Discussion. Callianassa sensu lato should be treated as a polyphyletic group (compare Ngoc-Ho, 2003). Thus, the new form described below cannot be placed in Callianassa as defined by Manning and Felder (1991) or Ngoc-Ho (2003). However, the generic concept of Cheramus is in flux (compare Manning and Felder, 1991; Poore, 1994; Sakai, 1999, 2005, 2011), and therefore, despite the close affinities to C. modesta (sometimes treated as Cheramus, see above), we here do not refer the new material to Cheramus. Additional studies of the morphological variability of the chelipeds in this genus are needed in order to apply its concept also to the fossil record. For the time being, we refer the new taxon to Callianassa sensu lato.

 

Callianassa (s.l.) ocozocoautlaensis new species

Figures 3.1–3.3

Diagnosis.Callianassid with chelipeds of unequal size and dissimilar shape. Major cheliped manus upper margin arcuate, lower margin straight, fixed finger shorter than manus, lateral surface with longitudinal depression, fingers of approximately the same length, occlusal margins armed. Minor cheliped carpus subtriangular, propodus long and slender, both fingers slender, unarmed and pointed.

Description.Cheliped unequal in size and dissimilar in shape. Carpus/propodus articulation at about 90°. Major cheliped merus poorly preserved, upper margin smooth, lower margin damaged. Carpus length approximately equal to height, proximo-lower margin damaged, no spines observed. Manus length slightly exceeding height; upper margin arcuate, smooth; lower margin straight, smooth. Fixed finger shorter than manus, triangular in shape, lateral surface with longitudinal depression (furrow), occlusal margin armed with small teeth, the dentition of the distal half poorly preserved. Dactylus approximately as long as fixed finger, occlusal margin armed with several blunt teeth.

Minor cheliped carpus subtriangular. Propodus long and slender, manus length approximately equal to height, distinctly shorter than fixed finger. Both fingers slender, unarmed and pointed.

Etymology.After the Ocozocoautla Formation.

Material examined.Holotype, and sole, specimen is IHNFG-4664.

Measurements (in mm).Major chela: carpus length 5.2, carpus height 5.4, manus length 6.0, manus height 5.6, dactylus length 4 (preserved portion); minor chela: carpus length 3.1, carpus height 2.6, manus length 2.3, manus height 2.3, dactylus length 4.5.

Occurrence. To date, this species is exclusively known from the lower Maastrichtian Ocozocoautla Formation, Chiapas (Mexico).

Discussion. Although the specimen possesses both chelae, it is difficult to assign it to any callianassid genus. The merus of the major cheliped usually is crucial in assigning fossil ghost shrimps to a particular genus (e.g., Schweitzer et al., 2003, 2006a; Hyžný and Hudáčková, 2012). In the material studied the merus is damaged and the lower margin is not discernible. The shape of the elements that are preserved, i.e. three distalmost elements (dactylus, propodus, carpus) of both chelae, exhibit similarities to extant Callianassa modesta as illustrated by De Man (1928; see Fig. 3.4 here). Both species share the general shape of the major manus and the fixed finger possessing a furrow over its full length. The differences mainly concern with the shape of the fingers: minor cheliped fingers of C. modesta are comparatively longer and the dentition on the major cheliped fingers is slightly different in both taxa. The dentition of cheliped fingers, however, is often subject to intraspecific variation (e.g., Hyžný and Hudáčková, 2012). More material is needed to determine the taxonomic importance of these differences, but because Callianassa (s.l.) ocozocoautlaensisis of Maastrichtian age, we treat it as a separate species.


Figure 3. Callianassa (s.l.) ocozocoautlaensis new species from the Lower Maastrichtian Ocozocoautla Formation, in comparison to extant Callianassa modesta De Man, 1905. 1: holotype of Callianassa (s.l.) ocozocoautlaensis, IHNFG-4664, with major and minor cheliped preserved; 2: same as 1, minor chela photographed under different light angle; 3: reconstruction of chelipeds of Callianassa (s.l.) ocozocoautlaensis (meri of both chelipeds are not sufficiently preserved), major chela (above) and minor chela (below). 4:Callianassa modesta, redrawn and modified (setae omitted) from De Man (1928; fig. 16b, c).

 

4. Discussion

 4.1. Mexican fossil ghost shrimps

The ghost shrimp fossil record of Mexico is relatively rich (Table 1), but given its fragmentary nature, it is difficult to document the true diversity. Only a limited number of taxa were identified at the generic level. A revision of Mexican ghost shrimp fossil record is desirable so as to understand the real diversity of their forms. Herein, a brief discussion is provided for each occurrence.

 

4.1.1. Upper Cretaceous

The oldest ghost shrimp record is Callianassa aquilae Rathbun, 1935 from the Turonian of the Eagle Ford Group of Múzquiz. Vega et al. (2007) transferred this species to Gourretia de Saint Laurent, 1973, but Bermúdez et al. (2013) have recently noted that the material illustrated as Gourretia aquilae by Vega et al. (2007) in fact comprised two different taxa. One proved to be conspecific with the type material of Callianassa aquilae and formed the basis for a new genus, Rathbunassa Hyžný in Bermúdez et al. (2013). The second taxon awaits formal description.

Vega et al. (1995a) recorded three incomplete chelae from the Maastrichtian Portrerillos Formation as ?Callianassa sp. The material preserves a ridge on the fixed finger, which might hint at the Eucalliacinae, but due to poor preservation a more detailed identification is impossible. The lateral surface of the propodus, however, is not ornamented with tubercles; thus, the species seems to differ from contemporaneous Eucalliax burckhardti(see above).

Vega et al. (1995b) noted several callianassid remains from the Maastrichtian Cárdenas Formation which they identified as Cheramus sp. and Protocallianassa sp. The material assigned to Cheramus does not preserve the merus, making identification doubtful. Schweitzer and Feldmann (2002) reassigned the material reported as Protocallianassa sp. to a new extinct genus, VegarthronSchweitzer and Feldmann, 2002.

 

4.1.2. Eocene

Schweitzer et al. (2006a) described numerous callianassid remains from the Eocene Bateque and Tepetate formations of Baja California Sur, Mexico. Two specimens showing incomplete chelae were attributed to Neocallichirus Sakai, 1988, one as Neocallichirus cf. N. rhinos Schweitzer and Feldmann, 2002, the second as Neocallichirus sp. Despite the fact that both specimens come from the same locality, Schweitzer et al. (2006a) stated that, because one possesses the reentrant in the distal margin of the manus and the other does not, they in fact represent two distinct species. However, we argue that the shape of the manus and carpus as depicted in Schweitzer et al. (2006a) clearly speaks for the conspecificity of these specimens. The presence of a reentrant often is subject to intraspecific variation and may also mirror sexual dimorphism (e.g., Sakai, 1969; Hyžný and Hudáčková, 2012) and therefore cannot be successfully used in species delimination. Later, Vega et al. (2008) recorded a single articulated specimen from the lower Eocene El Bosque Formation and referred it to Neocallichirus cf. N. rhinos. The specimen seems to be conspecific with the material from the Tepetate Formation (Schweitzer et al., 2006a), but differs significantly from N. rhinos as originally described from the Eocene of California (Schweitzer and Feldmann, 2002). The shape of merus of N. cf. rhinos has a strongly arcuate upper margin and the same can be said about the meral keel, while in N. rhinos these are straighter. We do acknowledge N. cf. rhinosas a separate taxon, but refrain from discussing its affinities further because this is beyond the scope of the present contribution. A re-examination of the original material is needed to establish its true affinities.

Schweitzer et al. (2006a) further listed fragmentary material of five other distinct morphotypes from the Eocene Bateque and Tepetate formations. Callianassidae sensu lato species 1 possesses a fixed finger with a longitudinal ridge which could underscore identification as a member of the Eucalliacinae (Hyžný, 2012). Vega et al. (2001b, 2008) recorded several specimens (as Callianassa sensu lato sp. and Callianassidae 2, respectively) from the El Bosque Formation that seem to be conspecific with Callianassidae sensu lato species 1 as described by Schweitzer et al. (2006a).

Callianassidae sensu lato species 2 of Schweitzer et al. (2006a) has affinities to GlypturusStimpson, 1866; this material was discussed by Hyžný and Müller (2012).

Callianassidae sensu lato species 3 from the Eocene Bateque Formation, as described by Schweitzer et al. (2006a), clearly corresponds to Callianassidae 1 from the Middle Eocene San Juan Formation as reported by Vega et al. (2008). The material shows an elongated propodus which is somewhat similar to that of e.g. Gourretia. For a proper generic assignment, however, better-preserved material is needed.

Callianassidae sensu lato species 4 from the Eocene Bateque Formation, recorded by Schweitzer et al. (2006a), shows affinities to Callianassa matsoni Rathbun, 1935. This species, from the Miocene of Florida (USA), was reassigned to Neocallichirus by Schweitzer and Feldmann (2002). Hyžný and Karasawa (2012) expressed doubts over the assignment of C. matsoni to Neocallichirus.

Callianassidae sensu lato species 5 from the Eocene Bateque and Tepetate formations (Schweitzer et al., 2006a) may represent the minor chelae of some of the other taxa listed above. A re-examination of the material is called for to either confirm or reject this assumption.

 

4.1.3. Neogene

Rathbun (1919) described Callianassa pellucida from the Oligocene of Anguilla. Collins et al. (2009) noted its presence also in the middle Miocene Tuxpan Formation in Mexico.

Vega et al. (2009) recorded Neocallichirus aetodes Schweitzer, Iturralde-Vinent, Hetler and Vélez-Juarbe, 2006b from the Miocene of Chiapas and the Pliocene of Veracruz, as well as Ctenochelessp. from the Miocene of Chiapas.

 

4.2. Survival across the K/Pg boundary

Schweitzer and Feldmann (2005) studied the survivorship of the decapod crustaceans across the K/Pg boundary and concluded that this catastrophic event did not have a severe impact on this group. They also listed several ghost shrimp genera which survived the K/Pg boundary perturbations, namely Calliax, Neocallichirus, Protocallianassa and Ctenocheles Kishinouye, 1926. However, recently doubts (although without detailed discussion) were expressed by Hyžný and Karasawa (2012) over the true status of Cretaceous occurrences of Neocallichirus. Several additional genera can now be added to the list, namely Callichirus Stimpson, 1866, Corallianassa Manning, 1987 and Vegarthron. Their Cretaceous records are based on Callichirus waagei Crawford, Feldmann, Waugh, Kelley and Allen, 2006 from the Maastrichtian of South Dakota (USA), Corallianassa acucurvata Swen, Fraaije and van der Zwaan, 2001 from the Maastrichtian of the Netherlands; and Vegarthron sp. from the Maastrichtian of Mexico (Vega et al., 1995b; see Table 1 here), respectively. The present contribution adds also Eucalliax with Eucalliax burckhardti as the oldest record of the genus. This species, known both from Maastrichtian and Danian of Argentina (Böhm, 1911; Aguirre-Urreta, 1989; Feldmann et al., 1995), is the sole known ghost shrimp species and one of the very few decapod crustacean species that straddled the K/Pg boundary (compare Schweitzer and Feldmann, 2005).

Interestingly, only members of the Ctenochelidae and the callianassid subfamilies Callichirinae and Eucalliacinae have so far been recorded to survive the K/Pg boundary. The present paper adds the first record of a confirmed member of the subfamily Callianassinae. The molecular analysis by Felder and Robles (2009) hinted at the paraphyletic nature of the subfamily Eucalliacinae and the basal position of its members close to the Ctenochelidae. The subfamilies Callichirinae and Callianassinae are positioned higher in the resulting tree topology (Felder and Robles, 2009), but as shown by the present study, all major ghost shrimp lineages (Ctenochelidae together with Eucalliacinae, Callichirinae, Callianassinae) were already established well before the Cenozoic. It seems that ghost shrimps are rather conservative taxa, which is not surprising given their fossorial life style.

 

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers, John W.M. Jagt (Natuurhistorisch Museum, Maastricht, the Netherlands) and Alessandro Garassino (Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Milan, Italy), for their constructive comments and improvement of the English. MH acknowledges the support of PalSIRP Sepkoski Grant 2011 and APVV-0436-12.

 

References

Aguirre-Urreta, M., 1989, The Cretaceous decapod Crustacea of Argentina and the Antarctic Peninsula: Palaeontology, 32, 499–552.

Alencáster, G., Omaña-Puido, L., 2006, Maastrichtian inoceramid bivalves from Central Chiapas, southeastern Mexico: Journal of Paleontology, 80, 5, 946–957.

Bate, C.S., 1888, Report on the Crustacea Macrura collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–76, inMurray, J. (ed.), Zoology: Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger During the Years 1873–76 Under the Command of Captain George S. Nares, R.N., F.R.S. and the Late Captain Frank Tourle Thomson, Edinburgh, United Kingsom, Neill and Company, 24, 1–942.

Bermúdez, H.D., Gómez-Cruz, A. de J., Hyžný, M., Moreno-Bedmar, J.A., Barragán, R., Moreno Sánchez, M.,Vega, F.J., 2013, Decapod Crustacea from the Cretaceous San Gil Group (Aptian-Albian) at Villa de Leyva section, Central Colombia: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Abhandlungen, 267, 255–272.

Beurlen, K., 1930, Vergleichende Stammesgeschichte Grundlagen, Methoden, Probleme unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der höheren Krebse: Fortschritte in der Geologie und Paläontologie, 8, 317–586.

Biffar, T.A., 1970, Three new species of callianassid shrimp (Decapoda, Thalassinidea) from the western Atlantic: Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 83, 34–50.

Biffar, T.A., 1973, The taxonomic status of Callianassa occidentalis Bate, 1888 and C. bateiBorradaile, 1903 (Decapoda, Callianassidae): Crustaceana, 24, 224–230.

Bishop, G.A., Williams, A.B., 2005, Taphonomy and preservation of burrowing thalassinidean shrimps: Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 118, 218–236.

Böhm, J., 1911, Callianassa burckhardti n. sp. nebst einer Zusammenstellung der fossilen Arten der Gattung Callianassa: Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, Monatsberichte, 63, 37–46.

Chubb, L.J., 1959, Upper Cretaceous of Central Chiapas, Mexico: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 43, 725–756.

Collins, J.S.H., Portell, R.W., Donovan, S.K., 2009, Decapod crustaceans from the Neogene of the Caribbean: diversity, distribution and prospectus: Scripta Geologica, 138, 55–111.

Crawford, R.S., Feldmann, R.M., Waugh, D.A., Kelley, B.M., Allen, J.G., 2006, Decapod crustaceans from the Maastrichtian Fox Hills Formation: Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, 47, 3–28.

Dana, J.D., 1852, Crustacea. Part I. United States Exploring Expedition, during the years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842, under the command of Charles Wilkes, U.S.N., 13: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., C. Sherman, 685 p.

De Grave, S., Pentcheff, N.D., Ahyong, S.T., Chan, T.-Y., Crandall, K.A., Dworschak, P.C., Felder, D.L., Feldmann, R.M., Fransen, C.H.J.M., Goulding, L.Y.D., Lemaitre, R., Low, M.E.Y., Martin, J.W., Ng, P.K.L., Schweitzer, C.E., Tan, S.H., Tshudy, D., Wetzer, R., 2009, A classification of living and fossil genera of decapod crustaceans: The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Supplement, 21, 1–109.

De Man, J.G., 1905, Diagnoses of new species of macrurous decapod Crustacea from the “Siboga-Expedition”: Tijdschrift der Nederlandsche Dierkundige Vereeniging, 9, 3-4, 587–614.

De Man, J.G., 1928, The Decapoda of the Siboga-Expedition. Part 7. The Thalassinidae and Callianassidae collected by the Siboga-Expedition with some remarks on the Laomediidae: Siboga Expeditie, 39, 1–187.

de Saint Laurent, M., 1973, Sur la systématique et la phylogénie des Thalassinidea: définition des familles des Callianassidae et des Upogebiidae et diagnose de cinq genres nouveaux (Crustacea Decapoda): Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des Séances de l’Académie des Sciences, 277, 513–516.

de Saint Laurent, M., 1979, Sur la classification et la phylogénie des Thalassinides: définitions de la superfamille des Axioidea, de la sous-famille des Thomassiniinae et de deux genres nouveaux (Crustacea Decapoda): Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires de Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 288, 1395–1397.

Felder, D.L., Robles, R., 2009: Molecular phylogeny of the family Callianassidae based on preliminary analysis of two mitochondrial genes, inMartin, J.W., Crandall, K.A., Felder, D.L. (eds.), Decapod Crustacean Phylogenetics: Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.A., Taylor & Francis/CRC, 327–342.

Feldmann, R.M., Casadío, S., Chirino-Gálvez, L., Aguirre-Urreta, M., 1995, Fossil decapod crustaceans from the Jaguël and Roca Formations (Maastrichtian-Danian) of the Neuquén basin, Argentina: The Paleontological Society Memoir, 43, 1–22.

Frost, S.H., Langenheim, R.L., 1974, Cenozoic Reef Biofacies; Tertiary Larger Foraminifera and Scleractinian Corals from Chiapas, Mexico: DeKalb, Illinois, U.S.A., Northern Illinois University Press, 388 p.

Glaessner, M.F., 1929, Crustacea Decapoda, inPompeckj, F.J. (ed.), Fossilium Catalogus, 1: Animalium, 41; Berlin, Germany, W. Junk, 1–464.

Gutiérrez-Gil, R., 1956, Geología del Mesozoico y Estratigrafía Pérmica del Estado de Chiapas: Excursión C-15 del Congreso Geológico Internacional, México, 20, 15–23.

Hyžný, M., 2011, In situmud shrimps (Decapoda: Axiidea: Callianassidae) preserved within their burrows from the middle Miocene of the Central Paratethys: Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 37, 37–46.

Hyžný, M., 2012, Calliaxina chalmasii(Brocchi, 1883) comb. nov. (Decapoda: Axiidea: Callianassidae: Eucalliacinae), a ghost shrimp from the Middle Miocene of Europe, with reappraisal of the fossil record of Eucalliacinae: Zootaxa, 3492, 49–64.

Hyžný, M., Hudáčková, N., 2012, Redescription of two ghost shrimps (Decapoda: Axiidea: Callianassidae) from the Middle Miocene of the Central Paratethys: systematics, intraspecific variation, and in situpreservation: Zootaxa, 3210, 1–25.

Hyžný, M., Karasawa, H., 2012, How to distinguish Neocallichirus, Sergio, Podocallichirus and Grynaminna(Decapoda: Callianassidae: Callichirinae) from each other in the fossil record?: Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 38, 59–68.

Hyžný, M., Müller, P.M., 2012, The fossil record of GlypturusStimpson, 1866 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Axiidea, Callianassidae) revisited, with notes on palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography: Palaeontology, 55, 967–993.

Kishinouye, K., 1926, Two rare and remarkable forms of macrurous Crustacea from Japan: Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses, 11, 63–70.

Latreille, P.A., 1802, Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière des crustacés et des insectes: Paris, France, F. Dufart, 468 p.

Leach, W.E. 1814, Crustaceology, inBrewster, D. (ed.), The Edinburgh Encyclopaedia, 7: London, United Kingdom, Baldwin, 385-437.

López-Ramos, E., 1981, Geología de México (Tomo II): México, D.F., México, Editorial Escolar, 446 p.

Manning, R.B., 1987, Notes on western Atlantic Callianassidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea): Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 100, 386–401.

Manning, R.B., Felder, D.L., 1991, Revision of the American Callianassidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea): Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 104, 764–792.

Michaud, F., 1988, Neogyroporella? servaisin. sp., nouvelle dasycladacée du Maastrichtien du Chiapas, sud-est du Mexique: Cretaceous Research, 9, 369–378.

Milne-Edwards, A., 1860, Histoire des crustacés podophthalmaires fossiles et monographie des décapodes macroures de la famille des thalassiens fossiles: Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 14, 129–294.

Montagu, G., 1808, Description of several marine animals found on the South Coast of Devonshire: Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 9, 81–114.

Ngoc-Ho, N., 2003, European and Mediterranean Thalassinidea (Crustacea, Decapoda): Zoosystema, 25, 439–555.

Omaña-Pulido, L., 1998, Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) foraminifers from the Inoceramus beds, Ocozocoautla Formation, central Chiapas, SE Mexico, inForams 98 International Symposium on Foraminifera: Monterrey, México, Sociedad Mexicana de Paleontología, Special Publication, 77 p.

Omaña-Pulido, L., 2006, Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) foraminiferal assemblage from the inoceramid beds, Ocozocoutla Formation, central Chiapas, SE Mexico: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 23, 125–132.

Poore, G., 1994, A phylogeny of the families of Thalassinidea (Crustacea: Decapoda) with keys to families and genera: Memoirs of Museum Victoria, 54, 79–120.

Poore, G., 2012, Callianassa modestaDe Man, 1905. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=477639, viewed in 2012-10-09.

Quezada-Muñetón, F.M., 1987, El Cretácico medio-Superior y el límite Cretácico Superior-Terciario inferior en la Sierra de Chiapas: Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Geólogos Petroleros, 39, 3–98.

Ramos, V.A., 1981, Descripción geológica económica de la Hoja 33c, Los Chihuidos Norte: Boletín del Servicio Geológico Nacional, 182, 1–104.

Rathbun, M.J., 1919, West Indian Tertiary decapod crustaceans, in Vaughan, T.W. (ed.), Contributions to the Geology and Paleontology of the West Indies: Washington, D.C., U.S.A., Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication, 291, 159–184.

Rathbun, M.J., 1935, Fossil Crustacea of the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain: Geological Society of America, Special Papers, 2, 1–160.

Robinson, E., 1968, Chubbina, a new Cretaceous alveolinid genus from Jamaica and Mexico: Palaeontology, 11, 526–534.

Sakai, K., 1969, Revision of Japanese callianassids based on the variations of larger cheliped in Callianassa petalura Stimpson and C. japonica Ortmann (Decapoda: Anomura): Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory, 17, 209–252.

Sakai, K., 1988, A new genus and five new species of Callianassidae (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea) from northern Australia: The Beagle, Records of the Museums and Art Galleries of the Northern Territory, 5, 51–69.

Sakai, K., 1999, Synopsis of the family Callianassidae, with keys to subfamilies, genera and species, and the description of new taxa (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea): Zoologische Verhandelingen, 326, 1–152.

Sakai, K., 2005, Callianassoidea of the world (Decapoda: Thalassinidea): Crustaceana Monographs, 4, 1-285.

Sakai, K., 2011, Axioidea of the World and a Reconsideration of the Callianassoidea (Decapoda, Thalassinidea, Callianassida): Crustaceana Monographs, 13, 1-520.

Schweitzer, C.E., Feldmann, R.M., 2002, New Eocene decapods (Thalassinidea and Brachyura) from southern California: Journal of Crustacean Biology, 22, 938-967.

Schweitzer, C.E., Feldmann, R.M., 2005, Decapods, the Cretaceous-Palaeogene Boundary, and Recovery, inKoenemann, S., Jenner R.A. (eds.), Crustacea and Arthropod Relationships: Boca Raton, Florida, U.S.A., Crustacean Issues, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. 16, 17-53.

Schweitzer, C.E., Feldmann, R.M., 2012, Revision of Decapoda deposited in The Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris: Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 38, 15-27.

Schweitzer, C.E., González-Barba, G., Feldmann, R.M. & Waugh, D.A., 2006a, Decapoda (Thalassinidea and Paguroidea) from the Eocene Bateque and Tepetate Formations, Baja California Sur, México: systematics, cuticle microstructure, and paleoecology: Annals of Carnegie Museum, 74, 275-293.

Schweitzer, C.E., Iturralde-Vinent, M., Hetler, J.L., Velez-Juarbe, J., 2006b, Oligocene and Miocene decapods (Thalassinidea and Brachyura) from the Caribbean: Annals of Carnegie Museum, 75, 111–136.

Schweitzer, C.E., Feldmann, R.M., Garassino, A., Karasawa, H., Schweigert, G., 2010, Systematic list of fossil decapod crustacean species: Crustaceana Monographs, 10, 1–222.

Schweitzer, C.E., Feldmann, R.M., Fam, J.M., Hessin, W.A., Hetrick, S.W., Nyborg, T.G., Ross, R.L.M., 2003, Cretaceous and Eocene decapod crustaceans from southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, NRC Research Press, 66 p.

Steele, D.R., Waite, L.E., 1986, Contributions to the stratigraphy of the Sierra Madre Limestone (Cretaceous) of Chiapas: Boletín del Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 102, 1–175.

Stimpson, W., 1866, Descriptions of new genera and species of Macrurous Crustacea from the coasts of North America: Proceedings of the Chicago Academy of Sciences, 1, 46–48.

Swen, K., Fraaije, R.H.B., van der Zwaan, G.J., 2001, Polymorphy and extinction of the Late Cretaceous burrowing shrimp Protocallianassa faujasi and first record of Corallianassa and Calliax(Crustacea, Decapoda, Thalassinoidea) from the Cretaceous: Contributions to Zoology, 70, 85–98.

Taylor, B.J., 1979, Macrurous Decapoda from the Lower Cretaceous of south-eastern Alexander Island: British Antarctic Survey Scientific Reports, 81, 1–39.

Vega, F.J., Feldmann, R.M., Villalobos-Hiriart, J.L., 1995a, Additions to the crustacean (Decapoda) fauna from the Portrerillos Formation (Late Cretaceous) in northeastern Mexico: Annals of Carnegie Museum, 64, 239–249.

Vega, F.J., Feldmann, R.M., Sour-Tovar, F., 1995b, Fossil crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda) from the Late Cretaceous Cárdenas Formation, east-central Mexico: Journal of Paleontology, 69, 340–350.

Vega, F.J., Feldmann, R.M., García-Barrera, P., Filkorn, H., Pimentel, F., Avendaño, J., 2001a, Maastrichtian Crustacea (Brachyura: Decapoda) from the Ocozocoautla Formation in Chiapas, southeast México: Journal of Paleontology, 75, 319–329.

Vega, F.J., Cosma, T., Coutiño, M.A., Feldmann, R.M., Nyborg, T.G., Schweitzer, C.E., Waugh, D.A., 2001b, New middle Eocene decapods (Crustacea) from Chiapas, México: Journal of Paleontology, 75, 929–946.

Vega, F.J., Nyborg, T., Rojas-Briceño, A., Patarroyo, P., Luque, J., Porras-Múzquiz, H., Stinnesbeck, W., 2007: Upper Cretaceous Crustacea from Mexico and Colombia: similar faunas and environments during Turonian times: Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas, 24, 403–422.

Vega, F.J., Nyborg, T., Coutiño, M.A., Hernández-Monzón, O., 2008, Review and additions to the Eocene decapod Crustacea from Chiapas, Mexico: Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 34, 51–71.

Vega, F.J., Nyborg, T., Coutiño, M.A., Solé, J., Hernández-Monzón, O., 2009, Neogene Crustacea from Southeastern Mexico: Bulletin of the Mizunami Fossil Museum, 35, 51–69.

 

Manuscript received: October 10, 2012.
Corrected manuscript received: October 29, 2012.
Manuscript accepted: November 4, 2012.